Using Digital Tools for Agroforestry Advice: Lessons from the UK Community of Practice

Author/s:

Benefits of the Practice

Faster, evidence based advisory decisions
Better agroforestry design and species choice
Improved mapping, baseline and monitoring

Thematic Areas

Agroforestry and Relation to Landscape
English language

Summary for Practitioners on the Main Finding/s or Innovative Solution/s

As part of the UK Community of Practice on agroforestry, tested through the Abacus Agri Climate Smart Advisor Team CPD, this practice addresses the challenge of providing consistent, evidence-based agroforestry advice. Agroforestry advisors are expected to cover system design, establishment, management, carbon and biodiversity outcomes, and scheme compliance, but doing this efficiently requires practical and repeatable tools.

The experience showed that advisors can work more effectively by using a small set of open-access digital tools that cover four core needs: (1) site constraints and opportunities, (2) tree and shrub species choice, (3) baseline mapping and monitoring, and (4) peer examples. Suggested toolkit examples include AgroforesTreeAdvice for tree species, varieties, and rootstocks matched to site constraints; the LPIS Sustainability Compass (LUCIM) for parcel context, land cover, and Copernicus-based indicators to support baseline assessment and targeting; and the Agroforestry Map of Europe and Gallery for peer examples, layouts, and contacts to sense-check designs and learn from practice.

In practice, Climate Smart Advisors should first define the agroforestry system, such as silvoarable, silvopastoral, orchards, or hedgerows. They should then identify the stage of enterprise development: scoping, design, establishment, or management. Mapping tools can be used to screen constraints and opportunities, species tools to shortlist options, and example maps to test layout and management choices with the farmer. Advisors should capture outputs, including maps, assumptions, and actions, and provide a clear follow-up report to the client. This approach supports faster and more consistent advice, provides stronger evidence for grant or investment decisions, and enables clearer conversations with farmers about trade-offs, performance, and monitoring.

Additional Information

What helps; keep an ‘advisor toolkit’ of 2 or 3 tools you are comfortable with and use them consistently across clients. Export maps and screenshots into a simple follow up pack so farmers can act on the advice.

What can get in the way; tools vary in geographic coverage, input requirements and maturity. Treat outputs as decision support, not ‘the answer’, and sense check against local soils, climate, markets and UK/ EU scheme rules. Some mapping functions depend on the availability and resolution of parcel data and satellite layers. Digital confidence and time to learn a new tool can be limiting factors.

Practical tip: agree a standard workflow; screen site, shortlist species, test layout, plan actions, record assumptions and capture farmer feedback; it improves your advisory offer and helps prioritise future tool development.

The UK ClimateSmartAdvisors Community of Practice

AgroforesTreeAdvice (tree species/variety selection decision support)

LPIS Sustainability Compass (LUCIM platform)

Agroforestry Map of Europe (peer examples and contacts)

CORDIS summary: agroforestry digital tools and results